fucking-amal.com

Posted: **Sun Dec 12, 2004 2:11 pm**

OK, it's done - <a href='http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A1ska_je_l%C3%A1ska' target='_blank'>link</a>. I also added the link to it to the english article (which I basically translated). I guess I'm gonna extend it a bit more later.

Posted: **Sun Dec 12, 2004 4:35 pm**

emp wrote: OK, it's done - <a href='http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A1ska_je_l%C3%A1ska' target='_blank'>link</a>. I also added the link to it to the english article (which I basically translated). I guess I'm gonna extend it a bit more later.

why did you add the IMDb-assessment??
i think its not good because if you look at the assessment in detail (click on vote and scroll down)
american/regular voters voted 6.6/6.9 and thats probably because of its not dubbed to their language so they pull the whole assessment down :-/
of course in that case they count too, but the assessment hasn't to be noticed in the article? :-)

do you get my point?
just an idea...

Posted: **Sun Dec 12, 2004 6:10 pm**

darkleon wrote: why did you add the IMDb-assessment??
i think its not good because if you look at the assessment in detail (click on vote and scroll down)
american/regular voters voted 6.6/6.9 and thats probably because of its not dubbed to their language so they pull the whole assessment down :-/
of course in that case they count too, but the assessment hasn't to be noticed in the article?
do you get my point?
just an idea...

Yeah, I get it, but it's a regular rating nonetheless, although screwed up by American voters. I changed the sentence to: The assessment is very positive in most cases, e.g. on IMDb, the movie has a user rating of 8.0/10 at the moment (detailed statistics reveal that US voters gave the film an average rating of 6.6 a brought the overall rating down - reason for a rating that's so different from the rest of the world is unknown). Most of both proffesional reviewers and internet users agree that it's a very realistic story about growing up and the love itself, not only the lesbian love.

Posted: **Sun Dec 12, 2004 6:43 pm**

emp wrote:
darkleon wrote: why did you add the IMDb-assessment??
i think its not good because if you look at the assessment in detail (click on vote and scroll down)
american/regular voters voted 6.6/6.9 and thats probably because of its not dubbed to their language so they pull the whole assessment down :-/
of course in that case they count too, but the assessment hasn't to be noticed in the article?
do you get my point?
just an idea...

Yeah, I get it, but it's a regular rating nonetheless, although screwed up by American voters. I changed the sentence to: The assessment is very positive in most cases, e.g. on IMDb, the movie has a user rating of 8.0/10 at the moment (detailed statistics reveal that US voters gave the film an average rating of 6.6 a brought the overall rating down - reason for a rating that's so different from the rest of the world is unknown). Most of both proffesional reviewers and internet users agree that it's a very realistic story about growing up and the love itself, not only the lesbian love.

mmh don't know
is a assessment/own opinion at all permitted in an encyclopedia??
i think it should be neutral

and is it really important what is written on imdb?
respectively what users vote?

Posted: **Sun Dec 12, 2004 6:47 pm**

darkleon wrote: mmh don't know
is a assessment/own opinion at all permitted in an encyclopedia??
i think it should be neutral

and is it really important what is written on imdb?
respectively what users vote?

But I think it's pretty much neutral....it says something about how is it rated throughout on the internet and I base it on the biggest movie site. It also gives you some facts on the voting statistics. I could have written it like "Most of the users, including me, say this movie is just GREAT. Because this movie is soooo realistic and so nice. You really have to see for yourself. And the idiots from USA gave it 6.6 on IMDB, morons."

Posted: **Wed Dec 15, 2004 10:14 am**

A czech admin reviewed the page, corrected some mistakes, but didn't say anything about the assessment part, so I guess that's allright.
BTW I love wikipedia, I already wrote a second article, great feeling

olleyes:

Posted: **Wed Dec 15, 2004 7:25 pm**

emp wrote: BTW I love wikipedia, I already wrote a second article, great feeling olleyes:

yeah i like it too, although creative writing is not my case
so i try to translate, corrects mistake or whatever i like to :-)

Posted: **Fri Dec 17, 2004 8:33 pm**

hey, ill try to translate the text to spanish.

Posted: **Fri Dec 17, 2004 8:39 pm**

i just wanted to do it but it dindt work. its a bit strange

Posted: **Fri Dec 17, 2004 8:45 pm**

JustMe90 wrote: hey, ill try to translate the text to spanish.

cool!
if you have finished just write it hear so i can put i link to all other articles

Posted: **Sat Dec 18, 2004 1:57 pm**

JustMe90 wrote: i just wanted to do it but it dindt work. its a bit strange

How come? What what was the problem?

Posted: **Sat Dec 18, 2004 9:07 pm**

dunno. i just dont know how to do it on the shitty spanish site. i have already published some stuff in the german wikipedia (about marilyn manson) but the spanish wikipedia is different... ill try it again today

Posted: **Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:05 am**

JustMe90 wrote: dunno. i just dont know how to do it on the shitty spanish site. i have already published some stuff in the german wikipedia (about marilyn manson) but the spanish wikipedia is different... ill try it again today

That's strange. I think all wikis run on the same engine (maybe even on one server). It was probably just a temporary problem. When I was adding the FA article to the czech wiki, I saw a message about some temporary database lockdown. It was OK in an hour.

fucking-amal.com

FA on wikipedia.org