codyw1 wrote:Ginger Snaps. Very good. Am I the only person to think Emily Perkins is kinda hot?
Errrr hello? Doesn't Katharine Isabelle (as Ginger) get a mention? Ginger is probably the nearest I've seen to a screen portrayal of me as I am, both in looks and character. I guess you guys must have a ''thing'' about the older woman as Emily Perkins, although playing the younger sister is actually a couple of years older than Katharine. Like Rebecka she has mostly settled for domesticity, got married and has produced a couple of sprogs since the film was made.
If you haven't already you should see the sequel "Ginger Snaps Unleashed". Emily has the major role as Ginger's is reduced to little more than an occasional walk-on. The plot stands up well in its own right, there is quite a lot in common with the film ''Girl Interrupted'' as she is incarcerated in a psychiatric hospital. There is a marvellous complement in the introduction of the young character ''Ghost'' into the plot, and lots of the same dark humor as Ginger Snaps. It also has the excellent closing track of ''Beautiful (like me)'' by Toronto based band Joydrop.
It was produced back to back with the prequel ''Ginger Snaps Back'' which is set in 1815 but in which the two girls, Katharine and Emily have more equal billing. There is little humor in this one but it is a better than standard gothic horror flick. It also ties together loose ends from the other two films.
Sadly, "Ginger Snaps Unleashed", pretty much bombed at the box office (perhaps because the gorgeous Katharine Isabelle was reduced to a minor role), so ''Ginger Snaps Back'' never went on general release but went straight to DVD. I have all three in the trilogy. If you look out for second hand outlets (but they don't come up often) you shouldnt have to pay more than 3 or 4 quid for each of them.
There is an excellent website made by the company who acted as art director consultants on Ginger Snaps. This gives a fascinating insight into the much under-rated role of ''art director'' in films in general. In addition it has a lot of detailed info about the the making of the film, location finding around Toronto, designs, floor plans, prosthetics etc . The film was beset with production difficulties being shot in a very tight time frame in Fall, e.g. actors catching colds, badly fitting false teeth, Emily's wig (she actually had short hair and there wasn't time for her to grow it) lighting so powerful to emulate daylight (the greenhouse scenes) that sparked a local security alert etc. I'll dig out the link sometime.